Home
About Us
Medical Malpractice
Tobacco Litigation
Case Law
News Stories
Links to Sites
Contact Us

 

 

Sommers and Roth Professional Corporation

Case Law

Sommers & Roth Professional Corporation is a leader in the areas of obstetrical negligence, medical malpractice, products liability and general personal injury litigation. What follows is a selection of some of the jurisprudence generated by our litigation.

Please note that this website also includes news stories from the Toronto Star and The Lawyers Weekly relating to a selection of our cases.

Some of the following decisions are lengthy and thus may require additional download time for low-speed modem connections.

Crawford (Litigation guardian of) v. Penney et al., [2004] O.J. No. 3669 (C.A.) dismissing appeal from Crawford (Litigation guardian of) v. Penney et al., [2003] O.J. No. 89 (S.C.J.)

Imperial Tobacco Limited, Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. - v. - Ljubisa Spasic, as Estate Trustee of the Estate of Mirjana Spasic [2001] (Ont.) (Civil) (28174).

Spasic Estate v. Imperial Tobacco Ltd. (2000), 49 O.R. (3d) 699 (C.A.) rev'g [1998] O.J. No. 4906 (S.C.J.).

MacLean v. Wallace, [1999] O.J. No. 3220 (S.C.J.).

Chow (Litigation guardian of) v. Wellesley Hospital, [1999] O.J. No. 279 (S.C.J.).

Chrappa v. Ohm (1996), 29 O.R. (3d) 222 (Gen. Div.), aff'd (1998), 38 O.R. (3d) 651 (C.A.).

Hock (Next friend of) v. Hospital for Sick Children [1995] O.J. No. 1104 (Gen. Div.), aff’d and rev’d in part [1998] O.J. No. 336 (C.A.).

Foster v. Citadel General Assurance Co. (1997), 36 O.R. (3d) 750 (Gen. Div.).

Ing (Litigation Guardian of) v. Guest, [1993] O.J. No. 1818 (Gen. Div.).

Giannone v. Weinberg, [1986] O.J. No. 369 (H.C.J.), damages varied (1989), 68 O.R. (2d) 767 (C.A.), leave to appeal dismissed (February 8, 1990), S.C.C. Doc. No. 21573.

Branche v. MacArthur (1986), 56 O.R. (2d) 71 (Div. Ct.).

Soldwisch v. Toronto Western Hospital (1983), 43 O.R. (2d) 449 (Div. Ct.).

Demeter v. Occidental Life Ins. Co. (1979), 26 O.R. (2d) 391 (Div. Ct.).

Yepremian v. Scarborough General Hospital (1978), 20 O.R. (2d) 510 (H.C.J.), rev’d in part (1980), 28 O.R. (2d) 494 (C.A.), leave to S.C.C. granted. See application for approval of settlement in Yepremian v. Scarborough General Hospital (No. 2) (1981), 31 O.R. (2d) 384 (H.C.J.).

Note: To ensure accuracy, readers are advised to refer to the reported or published version of these cases.

Back to Top